Indicators on case laws on sub agent You Should Know
Indicators on case laws on sub agent You Should Know
Blog Article
When the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC could dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not experienced a possibility to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In some cases, the NIRC might allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is often only finished If your employee can show that they'd a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. Within the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence and also the petitioner company responded towards the allegations as such they were perfectly mindful of the allegations and led the evidence as such this point is ofno use to get seemed into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 204 Order Date: 04-FEB-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
For legal professionals, there are specific rules regarding case citation, which range depending about the court and jurisdiction hearing the case. Proper case regulation citation in the state court will not be ideal, and even accepted, for the U.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 235/2025 (S.B.) Atif S/o Latif V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252216 Tag:The legislation enjoins the police to generally be scrupulously fair on the offender and the Magistracy is to make sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court and also from other courts However they have did not have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court.
The an abundance of this power casts an obligation over the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for your crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. However it really is made apparent that police is free to consider action against any person who is indulged in criminal activities issue to legislation. eight. The DIGP concerned is directed to prioritize this matter and, after hearing both parties within two weeks, address the alleged police misconduct. In case the officials are found culpable, departmental proceedings for their punishment must be initiated, they usually shall be assigned non-discipline duties while in the interim period. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 113 Order Date: 08-APR-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Therefore, this petition is found being not maintainable which is dismissed along with the pending application(s), as well as petitioners may seek out remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
The proposal appears to be reasonable and acceded to. Within the meantime police shall remain neutral from the private dispute between the parties, however, if any in the individuals is indulged in criminal activity the police shall consider prompt action against them under regulation. 5. The moment petition is disposed of in the above mentioned terms. Read more
116 . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Mobile Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 12 Justice in the Peace u/s 22-A is not obliged to afford a possibility of hearing to the accused party; nor obliged to automatically or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is needed to take into account all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid machinery of criminal law from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are a number of the relevant factors. Read more
Because of this, simply citing the case is more more likely to annoy a judge than help the party’s case. Visualize it as calling an individual to inform them you’ve found their lost phone, then telling them you live in these kinds of-and-these types of neighborhood, without actually providing them an address. Driving round the community looking to find their phone is probably going to be more frustrating than it’s really worth.
In some jurisdictions, case legislation might be applied to ongoing adjudication; for example, criminal proceedings or family legislation.
12. There is no denial from the fact that in Government service it is anticipated that the persons possessing their character above board, free from any moral stigma, are to generally be inducted. Verification of character and antecedents can be a condition precedent for appointment into a Government service. The candidates must have good character and supply two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above is that the only impediment to being appointed to a Government service is the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a means out or guise to carry out away with the candidature of your petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 185 Order Date: fifteen-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
This page contains slip opinions. Slip opinions are classified as the opinions that are filed within the working day that the appellate court issues its decision and are sometimes not the court's final opinion.
ten. Based within the findings with the inquiry committee, this petition is just not deemed maintainable which is therefore liable to be dismissed, which is dismissed accordingly with pending application(s) if any. Read more
171 . Const. P. 1832/2019 (D.B.) Muhammad Fakhar ul Hasnain V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It really is well recognized now that the provision for proforma promotion just isn't alien or unfamiliar into the civil servant service structure however it is already embedded in Fundamental Rule seventeen, wherein it truly is lucidly enumerated that the appointing authority could if satisfied that a civil servant who was entitled to become promoted from a particular date was, for no fault of his very here own, wrongfully prevented from rendering service on the Federation/ province in the higher post, direct that such civil servant shall be paid the arrears of shell out and allowances of such higher post through proforma promotion or upgradation arising from the antedated fixation of his/her seniority. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming for the main case, It is usually a effectively-founded proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty on the charge, however, that is issue for the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to reach at its independent findings over the evidence.